| [ << previous ] |
EDUARD VAN BEINUM 1900-1945 |
|
source: Eduard van Beinum, the radio recordings. Q Disc
97015. Kees Wisse
Eduard van Beinum was born in Arnhem on September 3, 1900. His was a
musical family: |
|
The young conductor of the 'Haarlem Orkest Vereeniging', 1928
|
In
the late summer of 1927 Van Beinum happened to read a newspaper
advertisement inviting applicants for the post of conductor of the
Haarlem Orchestral Society, the future Noordhollands Philharmonic
Orchestra. Encouraged by his wife, Van Beinum promptly wrote to the
orchestra, offering his services. After a trial direction he received
the appointment and he made his debut with the orchestra on October 10,
1927. His handling of the orchestra at once impressed the musicians, the
audience and the board. Very soon they saw in him the man who could take
the Haarlem orchestra to a higher artistic plain. For this purpose Van
Beinum was given an almost completely free hand. He was to he the
orchestra's undisputed musical director. He introduced it to French
music. Berlioz, Franck, Debussy, but also the new generation of French
composers, including Ravel and Roussel, became regular fare, and Van
Beinum succeeded in giving a brilliant account of this demanding
repertoire. At the same time he championed the music of a new generation
of Dutch composers. With works of such young composers as Willem
Andriessen and Guillaume Landre' on the programme, the Haarlem orchestra
soon earned itself a reputation as a "testing station for Dutch
music".As a result, Van Beinum not only achieved the ascent of the Haarlem orchestra to greater fame, but also the rapid rise of his own star as a conductor. This rise did not go unnoticed in the wider world. From the Amsterdam Concertgebouw Van Beinum received an invitation to guest-conduct, and on 30 June 1929 he faced the famous Concertgebouw orchestra for the first time. He had fulfilled the promise he had made to his mother, fifteen years ago. |
The
invitation from the Concertgebouw Orchestra was indeed a great honour.
The C.O. had been founded in 1888 as the resident orchestra of the then
brand-newConcertgebouw, and its first conductor was Willem Kes. Seven years later, in 1895, he was succeeded by Willem Mengelberg, who in a few years' time raised the orchestra to an unprecedented artistic level and made it take its place among the world's greatest. Foreign tours, gramophone recordings and radio broadcasts did much to spread the C.O.'s fame. By the time Van Beinum began to conduct the orchestra, its stature in the world was unchallenged. Van Beinum's first concert with the Concertgebouw Orchestra consisted of a performance of Haydn's Oxford Symphony, Rimsky-Korsakov's Piano Concerto and Saint-Saens's Third Symphony. The impression he left with this concert was a positive one, with the audience, but even more so with the orchestra's governors. He was invited to do more guest directions, even to conduct concerts in the orchestra's regular subscription series. Eventually he was given a permanent engagement. When the second conductor, Cornelis Dopper, left the orchestra, the choice of a successor was an obvious one. |
| For Van Beinum the appointment was a giant step ahead in his
conducting career. But there were drawbacks. In Haarlem he had had a
free hand in musical matters, deciding what was to he played and with
whom. His position in Amsterdam was quite different. Here the great
leader was Willem Mengelberg, who set out the orchestra's course with
Pierre Monteux, and later Bruno Walter, at his side. The second
conductor's role was confined to doing what he was told. In addition,
his reception by the Amsterdam audience was one of cautious reserve. Van
Beinum was not a powerful personality of Mengelberg's type. His ideal
was to pay respect to the music and the musician. He tried to approach a
score objectively and to present it in as honest a manner as possible.
His attitude towards the orchestra served that purpose. Instead of
making it subservient to his will, he tried to enlist the musicians'
cooperation in rendering the composer's intentions as faithfully as they
could. He occupied his place on the dais with modesty. For the
orchestra, used to Mengelberg's often heavy-handed treatment, Van
Beinum's direction came as a welcome relief. The idea that they were
working with, not under, a conductor, gave the musicians a feeling of
being respected and appreciated. They soon came to adore him. The
audience, for the greater part, where less enamoured. Many saw his
approach as superficial, even cavalier. "Van Beinum fails to
captivate" was the verdict in one of the early reviews. The new conductor had a hard time winning over his listeners to his way of music making. Gradually, however, he began to succeed. In those early years he applied himself to the music that was dearest to his heart, that of the contemporary French and Dutch composers, and Bruckner. The first concert he led in his function of second conductor, on 6 September 1931, included a performance of Bruckner's Eighth Symphony. It was to become one of Van Beinum's favourite works, which he often returned to and which he conducted as his personal testimony at his jubilee with the orchestra, 25 years later. |
Even
as second conductor Van Beinum managed to deploy his talent to the full.
Over the years he received many attractive offers from other orchestras
to become their principal conductor. When, in 1937, the Utrecht symphony
orchestra asked him for this post, the Concertgebouw musicians, appalled
at the prospect of losing their beloved Van Beinum, petitioned the
orchestra's board of directors to prevent him from leaving.Soon afterwards he received a similar offer from the Residentie Orchestra of The Hague. This offer was especially attractive, the Hague orchestra being generally considered to be the second best in the land. Van Beinum was severely tempted. The C.O. directors tried to avert the danger by appointing him" second principal conductor" next to Mengelberg. He accepted the appointment and thus was saved for Amsterdam. His first concert in his new capacity, on January 13,1938, was a festive occasion, more so because it premiered the Second Symphony of Hendrik Andriessen, Van Beinum's favourite Dutch composer. The appointment further enhanced his standing, singling him as the man eventually to succeed the ageing Willem Mengelberg. |
|
The outbreak of World War Two threw all this in disarray. The German
occupation profoundly affected all areas of life in the Netherlands,
including the arts. The Nazis tried hard to reform Dutch society in
their own standards. For the Concertgebouw Orchestra this meant that
the music of entartete (degenerate) composers was banned, that Jewish
musicians were to he sacked and that the orchestra's artistic policy
was directly and indirectly determined by the conquerors. For Van
Beinum hard times had begun. Willem Mengelberg sided with the Germans,
a choice which permanently lost him his goodwill with the Dutch
public. Van Beinum detested the Nazis and kept himself as aloof as he
could, only giving info their demands if there was no way out. A few
times he protested openly. He kept the concert season going as well as
he could, while Mengelberg spent most of his time touring abroad.
Despite these hard times, Van Beinum's popularity with the public and
the orchestra still grew. After Holland's liberation in May 1945, the
country could take stock of its conduct under five years of German
rule. For the Concertgebouw Orchestra this process was particularly
painful. Willem Mengelberg was convicted of having been a Nazi
collaborator and sentenced to exile for six years. He died embittered
at his chalet in Switzerland in the spring of 1051, just a few months
before the end of his exile was due. Willem's cousin Rudolf
Mengelberg, who was a director of the C.O. during the war, was
suspended from his post. On review, two years later, he was fully
rehabilitated. Of the 17 Jewish members of the orchestra 3 had died in
the Holocaust - 14 went into hiding and survived the war - and had to
he replaced. Other musicians were found guilty of collaboration and
dismissed. They too had to he replaced. Van Beinum got off with an
official reprimand. The verdict was that his wartime conduct, although
less than firm at times, did not warrant a suspension. biography 1945-1959 [ next >> ] |
|
(p) 2001 Dutch Divas |